Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668668›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Ultraslow brain dynamics as neurophysiological markers of information sampling during learning.

Patricia León-Cabrera, Anna Prunell-Castañé, Thomas F Münte, Shunkai Wang, Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patricia León-CabreraDepartment of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna Prunell-CastañéCatalan Institute of Oncology, Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.
Thomas F MünteCentre for Brain Behavior and Metabolism and Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Shunkai WangDepartment of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni Rodríguez-FornellsDepartment of Cognition, Development and Educational Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To learn, we must actively sample information from our environment: selecting, prioritizing, and extracting relevant cues. Here, we investigated whether ultraslow event-related potentials (ERPs) could track information sampling as participants learned new words from sentence contexts that provided varying amounts of information about their meaning, requiring them to actively extract learning-relevant cues. Ultraslow negative ERPs emerged while participants engaged in learning. Although ultraslow brain activity was not modulated by the level of informativeness of the contexts, individual differences in learning success were associated with steeper ultraslow voltage slopes. Specifically, participants with better learning outcomes exhibited a steeper ultraslow slope while learning from informative contexts, suggesting greater engagement and exploitation of relevant information. Together, these findings identify ultraslow brain activity as candidate neurophysiological markers of information sampling and provide evidence that individual differences in these dynamics relate to successful learning.

Indexed as

contextual word learninginformation samplingN400ultraslow event-related potentials

Identifiers

PMID42668668
PMCPMC13524776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.