ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026
A cardiovascular-motor axis framework for perfusion-mediated motor impairment.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide, and among survivors of heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, valvular disease, and atrial fibrillation many develop motor impairment: weakness, slow gait, sarcopenia, frailty. These deficits are usually attributed to deconditioning or coexisting conditions. This narrative review advances a different hypothesis: that reduced arterial blood delivery, from a failing pump or a narrowed artery, itself drives motor impairment at every level of the motor pathway, from cortex to muscle fibre. We group cardiovascular conditions into systemic models of low blood flow (heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction, low-flow aortic stenosis, atrial fibrillation) and regional models of arterial obstruction (carotid, subclavian, and vertebral stenosis; peripheral arterial disease), quantifying the perfusion deficit where haemodynamic data exist. We then examine mechanisms: cerebral hypoperfusion that thins the motor cortex and weakens motor planning; vulnerability of the cerebellum, basal ganglia, and spinal motor neurons, impairing coordination and gait; ischaemic peripheral nerve damage that denervates muscle; loss of muscle capillaries, mitochondrial injury, and failed regeneration; amplified feedback from underperfused muscle that suppresses central motor drive; and gating of corticospinal excitability by the cardiac cycle. Causality is supported by within-patient comparisons, in which a lateralised ischaemic limb or hypoperfused hemisphere weakens while the opposite side, under identical systemic conditions, does not; by graded perfusion-to-outcome relationships; and by recovery after cardiac transplantation, ventricular assist device support, valve replacement, and revascularisation. Deconditioning amplifies these effects rather than causing them, so treatment should restore blood flow and rebuild muscle together.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.