Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668656›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2026

Community pharmacists' views on the implementation of a national electronic prescription transfer system to pharmacies: A cross-sectional survey.

Kieran Dalton, Ciara Kenny, Maeve Culhane, Robert Callaghan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kieran DaltonPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Ciara KennyPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Maeve CulhanePharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Robert CallaghanPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Legislation was implemented in Ireland in April 2020 to permit electronic prescription transfer (EPT) from prescribers directly to pharmacies using a national secure email system (Healthmail). With a clear need to assess how this initiative affected patient care delivery, this study aimed to evaluate community pharmacists' views of EPT to pharmacies via Healthmail. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was disseminated via email in November 2020 to all Pharmaceutical Society of Ireland pharmacist registrants with 'community pharmacy' as their practice area ( Results: From 494 responses, most agreed it was an efficient and convenient method of prescription transfer (89.7%), 81.8% agreed it had successfully integrated into dispensary workflow, and 75.8% preferred receiving prescriptions in this way compared to other methods. While 94.7% agreed it was a positive step for pharmacy practice, key points from the open comments included concerns with identifying the sender of prescriptions and the need to better manage patient expectations on prescription processing times. The majority believed that patients did not have enough information about Healthmail (70.5%) and 63.2% perceived that it has led to patients feeling less involved in the decision-making related to their care. Conclusion: This study indicates that pharmacists were mostly positive about the national introduction of EPT to pharmacies, while also perceiving concerns regarding its potential negative impact on patients' medication management. Further guidance for all stakeholders should be considered a high priority when implementing EPT to achieve best practices.

Indexed as

CommunicationCommunity pharmacyGeneral practitionerPharmacistPrescriptionPrimary careSurvey

Identifiers

PMID42668656
PMCPMC13524745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.