ArticleCurrent research in food science2026
EEG feature extraction and machine learning for consumer preference analysis of whisky.
Article in Current research in food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding consumer preference for food and beverages is central to product development, yet subjective self-reports alone often lack objectivity. Electroencephalography (EEG) can reveal implicit neural signals of preference. However, existing flavor studies utilizing EEG are mostly confined to group difference analysis, cannot identify stable preference-related EEG markers or achieve objective preference prediction. To address this gap, this study integrated sensory evaluation, systematic EEG feature extraction and machine learning to quantify and predict consumer whisky preference. Twenty-four panelists were tested with 12 whisky samples via 9-point hedonic and 5-point JAR scales. Time-domain and frequency-domain features were extracted from EEG recordings, and four classification models were trained to predict preference. Compared with the accuracy of models built on raw EEG data (≈51%), feature extraction significantly boosted performance, with the Random Forest model achieving the highest test accuracy of 82.6%. Feature weight analysis further identified potentially predictive EEG indicators, including frontal α asymmetry and α band power. This work verifies the predictive capacity of EEG features for machine learning modeling, thereby establishing a neurophysiologically based method for the objective evaluation. This scheme complements traditional subjective sensory assessment and delivers actionable technical guidance for industrial flavor tuning and product development. However, the high homogeneity of participants in age and background limits the generalizability of our experimental results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.