ArticleHardwareX2026
Low-Cost and Tough Pneumatic Artificial Muscle (LT-PAM).
Article in HardwareX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pneumatic artificial muscles (PAMs) are widely used as soft actuators in biomechanics and robotics, yet their adoption in laboratories is often hindered by skill-dependent fabrication processes or reliance on costly commercial products. This article presents an open-source Low-Cost and Tough Pneumatic Artificial Muscle (LT-PAM) designed for research and educational use, with an emphasis on ease of fabrication, reproducibility, and mechanical robustness. The actuator uses a silicone inner tube, a braided sleeve, and mechanically crimped metal fittings that eliminate the need for adhesive bonding in load-bearing connections. All components are assembled from off-the-shelf parts and simple 3D-printed end plugs, enabling rapid and repeatable in-house fabrication. The basic mechanical characteristics are evaluated through quasi-static force-length tests under constant pressure and pressure-contraction tests under constant load, confirming canonical McKibben-type behavior with low sample-to-sample variability. Rupture tests and long-term cyclic tests further demonstrate robustness, with specimens sustaining tensile loads of approximately 600-800 N and surviving more than 9000 pressurization cycles without catastrophic failure. These results indicate that the LT-PAM is a practical, low-cost, and reproducible soft actuator for experiments with high-load soft robots, including musculoskeletal robotic systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.