ArticleiScience2026
Harnessing biological variability for mechanistic inference: A stochastic framework applied to neural stem cell dynamics.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inter-individual heterogeneity is often treated as noise, yet its temporal evolution can reveal regulatory mechanisms hidden from mean-field behavior. We present a stochastic framework that exploits variability for mechanistic inference in cell population dynamics. Using adult neurogenesis as a case study, we develop a state-dependent stochastic model of transitions between quiescent and active states and derive a diffusion approximation for the dynamics of both mean and variance. Applied to repeated cross-sectional data from wild-type and interferon-receptor knockout mice, we show that distinct regulatory mechanisms can produce similar mean dynamics but different fluctuation patterns. Jointly fitting mean and variance identifies proliferation-rate regulation as the dominant contributor to variability, while activation and self-renewal primarily govern average and long-term dynamics. Wild-type mice exhibit regulation of all three processes, whereas knockout mice lose activation control. These results show that population-level variability provides mechanistic information beyond average dynamics and helps distinguish between competing mechanistic models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.