ArticleRadiology case reports2026
Telemedicine-guided management of iodinated contrast media-associated anaphylaxis: A case report.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media (ICM) are uncommon, and ICM-associated anaphylaxis with airway compromise is rare, but time critical. In recent years, radiology has increasingly incorporated telemedicine-enabled workflows, including forms of virtual direct supervision, supported in part by evolving U.S. reimbursement and supervision policies. As of January 1, 2026, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has finalized policies indefinitely permitting direct supervision via real-time 2-way audiovisual communications in specified contexts, such as diagnostic imaging. A 63-year-old woman undergoing outpatient CT pelvis with contrast developed acute urticaria, hypotension, hypoxemia, and upper-airway angioedema within minutes of injection, meeting clinical criteria for anaphylaxis. An on-site technologist initiated emergency protocol and activated a telemedicine emergency alert, prompting real-time audiovisual communication with an already connected remote supervising physician. Under remote physician guidance, the on-site team administered two 0.3 mg intramuscular doses of epinephrine, supplemental oxygen, and airway positioning maneuvers, with subsequent improvement in oxygenation and systolic blood pressure before EMS arrival. The patient was later intubated in the emergency department for airway protection, extubated the following day, and discharged home without neurologic sequelae. This case suggests that telemedicine-enabled supervision platforms may support timely recognition and management of ICM-associated anaphylaxis when coupled with on-site preparedness, trained personnel, and readily available emergency medications and airway adjuncts. However, remotely witnessed emergencies introduce distinct operational risks (eg, connection latency, communication handoffs), and warrant rigorous protocols, simulation-based training, and systems-level redundancy. Similar events may become increasingly relevant as distributed imaging care models expand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.