ReviewiScience2026
Integrating neural decoding, memristive materials, and adaptive control frameworks for next-generation hippocampal memory prosthetics.
Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Memory prosthetics, closed-loop brain-computer interfaces that decode hippocampal activity and deliver adaptive stimulation, are transitioning from animal proof-of-concept to first-in-human trials. Realizing chronically implantable systems requires co-design of three materials-mediated subsystems whose structure-property-processing (SPP) relationships have been treated in isolation: biocompatible electrode interfaces, on-chip neuromorphic computation, and closed-loop control hardware. This review presents an integrated framework. We map neuroscientific findings (theta-phase tracking, theta-gamma coupling, sharp-wave ripple detection) onto engineering specifications for latency, sampling, and charge injection, and onto materials requirements for impedance, switching endurance, and chronic stability. We develop an SPP taxonomy of two dominant materials families: chronic electrode coatings (Pt-Ir, IrOx, PEDOT:PSS, carbon-based, MXene) and oxide memristive synapses (Al2O3/TiO2-x, SrTiO3, HfO2). We further distinguish established findings from emerging directions and flag where small-cohort clinical results have been over-generalized. This synthesis provides materials-design targets for next-generation memory-prosthetic hardware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.