ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Factors associated with postextraction bleeding in patients with hemophilia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postextraction bleeding, a form of postoperative hemorrhage, remains challenging in hemophilia, yet multicenter evidence linking bleeding to extraction technique and local hemostatic measures is limited. Objectives: This study aimed to determine postextraction bleeding incidence and identify associated factors at procedure and tooth levels. Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort included patients with hemophilia A or B undergoing tooth extraction at 4 hemophilia care centers in Japan (January 2013 to March 2023). Postextraction bleeding was defined as bleeding not controlled by gauze compression requiring additional intervention within 14 days. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. Results: The cohort included 198 patients (hemophilia A, 161; hemophilia B, 37), 271 procedures, and 512 extracted teeth. Bleeding occurred in 33 procedures (12.2%) and 38 teeth (7.4%); first bleeding occurred at a mean of postoperative day 5.3 (median 6). At the procedure level, extraction of ≥4 teeth were associated with higher bleeding incidence (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.60, 95% CI 1.02-6.65). Tranexamic acid use was associated with a lower incidence at both the procedure level (adjusted OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.93) and tooth level (adjusted OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18-0.78), and primary wound closure was associated with bleeding (adjusted OR 11.2, 95% CI 1.42-89.3). No thrombotic events were documented. Conclusion: Delayed postextraction bleeding remains relatively common in hemophilia despite specialist care. Multiple extractions and nonuse of tranexamic acid was associated with postextraction bleeding. Findings require cautious interpretation because of retrospective design, confounding by indication, and limited bleeding events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.