ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026
Changes in postoperative symptom communities and network structure in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: A four-time-point study.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To describe changes in symptom communities and contemporaneous symptom network structure across four postoperative time points in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) undergoing flap reconstruction. Methods: This prospective longitudinal study included 251 participants with complete data. Symptoms were assessed on postoperative days 1 (T1), 3 (T2), 7 (T3), and 30 (T4) using the Chinese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck Module. Gaussian graphical models with EBICglasso regularization were estimated separately at each time point. Symptom communities were identified using principal component analysis (PCA), with exploratory graph analysis (EGA) performed as a sensitivity analysis. Node strength and bridge strength were summarized. Paired Network Comparison Tests with 2000 permutations compared networks across time points; global-strength comparisons were Bonferroni-adjusted. Results: In the PCA solution, three, three, four, and five symptom communities were identified at T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively; the sensitivity analysis yielded four, three, three, and six communities, indicating methodological sensitivity. Choking cough, somnolence, problems with mucus, and vomiting had the highest node strength at T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. Problems with mucus had the highest bridge strength at T1 and T2, lack of appetite at T3, and distress at T4. Global strength differed between T2 and T3 and between T2 and T4 after Bonferroni correction. Conclusions: These descriptive, hypothesis-generating findings provide a complementary view of postoperative symptom interrelationships and may support stage-specific symptom assessment. They do not establish causal mechanisms or validated intervention targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.