ArticleThe journal of liquid biopsy2026
Clinico-genomic risk stratification for biomarker-enriched trial design in poor-prognosis metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Article in The journal of liquid biopsy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An integrated prognostic risk-score (RS) based on prognostic clinical factors and plasma copy number alterations (CNAs) across independent metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) cohorts was applied as a classifier to guide development of biomarker-enriched clinical trial designs. Design: Plasma CNAs prognostic for survival were combined into a prognostic score and integrated with clinical prognostic factors to derive an integrated RS in three independent mCRPC cohorts. Biomarker-enrichment trial designs were simulated across a spectrum of enrichment fractions and enrichment thresholds for the RS to consider 1:1 randomization of high RS patients to a study treatment arm or to receive standard treatment, with either a two or a three-year follow-up. The enrichment strategy was applied to improve the trial's ability to detect survival benefit at a Hazard Ratio 0.70; 80% power. Design trade-offs were assessed between the number of "high-risk" patients screened versus enrolled under varying enrichment thresholds and degrees of enrichment of the RS. Results: Pooled mCRPC patients (N = 561) showed RS values from 0.243 to 3.924 and a RS ≥ 1 (60th percentile) was associated with shorter survival. Elastic net models for 2- and 3-year survival were developed. At a threshold ≥1 with 2-year follow-up, a hybrid biomarker-enriched design (50% unselected, 50% high-risk) required screening 768 patients to enroll 219 per arm (n = 438), while maintaining adequate power. Conclusion: An integrated clinico-genomic classifier can guide an mCRPC enrichment strategy by enriching a cohort with 50% short-survival patients balancing sample size and screening needs to achieve adequate power in a biomarker-enriched design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.