ArticleFood chemistry: X2026
Analysis of characteristic flavor compounds in coffee peels subjected to different thermal processing treatments based on GC-IMS and HS-SPME-GC-MS combined with chemical pattern recognition.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of microwave thermal processing treatment (MD) and hot-air thermal processing treatment (HAD) on the volatile flavor compounds of coffee peel, using sun-dried (SG) samples as the control. GC-IMS and HS-SPME-GC-MS were combined with multivariate analyses (PCA and PLS-DA) and ROAV evaluation. A total of 62 and 56 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were tentatively identified by GC-IMS and GC-MS, respectively, with ketones, aldehydes, alcohols, and esters representing the predominant classes. The two analytical methods exhibited complementary detection capabilities. PCA and PLS-DA clearly differentiated the three thermal drying treatments. Aroma-related compounds (VIP > 1 and ROAV ≥ 1) included 2-furanmethanethiol, 3-methylbutanal, (E)-2-decenal, ethyl heptanoate, hexanal, benzyl alcohol, linalool and β-ionone. Based on the nine core coffee flavor categories, SG exhibited a complex aroma profile characterized by herbal/vegetable, fruity, and nutty/cocoa notes; HAD was distinguished by highly pronounced floral notes; whereas MD presented both floral and roasted characteristics. The integrated analytical strategy effectively discriminated among different thermal processing treatments and identified putative aroma markers, which require further validation through olfactometry or sensory evaluation. This study provides a scientific basis for elucidating the flavor profile of coffee peel and supports the further development of coffee cascara tea products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.