ReviewCureus2026
Navigating the Spectrum of Cariology: Laser-Mediated Theranostics in Pediatric and Adult Populations.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laser technology has broadened the scope of dental caries management, supporting diagnosis, prevention, and treatment within a single minimally invasive framework, but its performance depends on operator expertise and on parameters matched to the tissue and the patient. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on laser-mediated theranostics in pediatric and adult cariology, comparing age-specific diagnostic and therapeutic applications and their impact on patient-centered, minimally invasive care. Peer-reviewed systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies from the last five years were identified in PubMed and Scopus. Across the evidence, laser-assisted approaches offer distinct benefits in each population. In primary dentition, laser fluorescence improves the detection of early enamel demineralization when dentition-specific thresholds are applied, while erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) systems reduce pain, anxiety, and the need for local anesthesia, improving cooperation. In permanent dentition, erbium lasers support conservative management of secondary caries, decontamination of affected tissue, and preservation of existing restorations. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) consistently reduces cariogenic biofilms in both populations, with particular value in adults presenting more complex periodontal and restorative conditions. Taken together, the evidence supports tailoring laser-assisted diagnosis and treatment to dentition type, lesion characteristics, and clinical objectives rather than relying on a single standardized approach; laser therapy is an effective, conservative option for caries management in both dentitions that improves patient comfort, although standardized clinical protocols are still needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.