ArticleBrain and behavior2026
Principal Components Analysis Relates Hippocampal Trisynaptic Circuit to Vividness of Visual Mental Imagery.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe hippocampal formation serves fundamental processes to support scene construction, learning, memory, and imagination. Here, we use principal components analysis (PCA) to investigate the relation of the trisynaptic circuit, and other hippocampal zones, to individual differences in visual mental imagery ability.
methodThe data from 53 healthy, middle- to older-aged adults with MRI scans of 36 hippocampal subfield volumes were entered into a PCA, which extracted information about individual differences in subfield volumes and their support, or not, of visual mental imagery ability.
findingsA seven-factor solution explained 85% of the variance in hippocampal subfield volumes. The first principal component explained 37% of the variance in referencing trisynaptic circuit subfields. The subjects' ability to form vivid visual mental imagery was indexed with the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ), which we used to compare the component scores of the 10 highest scoring VVIQ subjects to those of the 10 lowest scoring VVIQ subjects. The high VVIQ group possessed significantly larger component scores than the low VVIQ subjects, with the component referencing the trisynaptic pathway yielding significant differences between the high and low imagery groups. The second principal component indexed a previously unidentified hippocampal region, which referenced four neighboring subfields: the molecular layer, hippocampal tail, presubiculum, and subiculum. All four subfields had strong loadings of between 0.625 and 0.821 on Component 2, which appears to have pinpointed a cohesive structure performing as an integrated network.
conclusionThese findings suggest that the trisynaptic circuit is critical for the formation of vivid visual imagery with a lesser role for the parasubiculum, while another site consisting of four neighboring subfields (the molecular layer, hippocampal tail, presubiculum, and subiculum) serves alternative functions yet to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.