ArticleFungal biology and biotechnology2026
A superfamily of bioactive proteins from fungi - are these secondary metabolites?
Article in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSince decades, fungi are leveraged in biotechnology to produce high-value compounds used in multiple economic sectors. Strain and process optimisation is based on a comprehensive understanding of the production organism on the cellular and molecular level. Among three antifungal protein families in fungi, consisting of small cysteine-stabilised proteins, it has been shown that, for some family members, bioactivities are also associated with additional functions in their hosts, e.g., carbon metabolism, autophagy, or asexual development. These proteins are interesting as alternative source of novel antifungal drugs. However, their potential impact on biotechnological production is not yet elucidated.
resultsIn this study, we introduce the antifungal bubble protein "AgBP", from Aspergillus giganteus and further elucidate the reservoir of bioactive proteins in fungi. We used NCBI PSI-BLAST and subsequent phylogenetic and structural analyses of the Antifungal Protein (AFP), Bubble Protein (BP), and Neosartorya fischeri antifungal protein 2 (NFAP2) family members. We could identify further putative members: 165 AFP-, 102 BP-, and 219 NFAP2-like proteins. Six of the AFP and all 219 NFAP2 family members are not yet assigned on InterPro. All proteins were exclusively identified in fungi. To our best knowledge, this is the first study to report this group of bioactive proteins is shared among the two divisions of Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes. Phylogenetic tree analyses demonstrate restricted taxonomic distribution within single genera. Furthermore, the comparison of the tertiary structures of all members of the three AFP families clearly separates them from each other and from non-fungal small cysteine-stabilised antifungal proteins.
conclusionWe hypothesise that the three protein families represent a distinct superfamily of evolutionary related proteins. We further hypothesise that these proteins could be categorised as secondary metabolite like molecules of ribosomal origin. For brevity, we named this superfamily BPF (bioactive proteins from fungi). The distribution of BPF members is presumably driven by horizontal gene transfer. Furthermore, we hypothesise that BPF members likely serve rather different biological roles than merely acting as antimicrobials. Their hypothetical classification as potential secondary metabolite like proteins in combination with their occurrence among several biotechnologically relevant fungal genera, e.g., Aspergillus, Penicillium, Trichoderma, Schizophyllum, etc., emphasises their potential relevance for genetic and metabolic engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.