ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Nursing students' attitudes toward caring for dying patients: a quantitative study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnd-of-life care is a fundamental component of nursing practice; however, many nursing students report insufficient preparation, emotional discomfort, and a lack of confidence when caring for dying patients. Cultural and religious factors may further influence students' attitudes toward death and dying, particularly in Saudi Arabia. Understanding these attitudes and their associated factors is essential to improving nursing education and preparing students for compassionate end-of-life care. This study examined attitudes toward caring for dying patients among final-year nursing students at King Saud University and explored the influence of gender, previous death-related experiences, and religious commitment on these attitudes, including religiosity's potential moderating role.
methodsThis study used a quantitative cross-sectional design. A convenience sample of 318 final-year "Level 8" nursing students completed a self-administered questionnaire, including demographic variables, death-related experiences, a single-item scale measuring religiosity (religious commitment), and the Frommelt Attitudes Toward Care of the Dying Scale (FATCOD-B). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, Pearson's correlation, and hierarchical multiple regression.
resultsThe students demonstrated neutral to moderately negative attitudes toward caring for dying patients (M = 25.45, SD = 5.95). Male students reported significantly more positive attitudes than female students (p < 0.001); gender accounted for 3.4% of the variance in attitudes (R² = 0.034). No significant associations were found between these attitudes and previous death-related experiences or palliative care education. Religious commitment was not a significant predictor of attitudes when added to the model (ΔR² = 0.003, p = 0.312), and its moderating effect on the relationship between gender and attitudes was not statistically significant (ΔR² = 0.011, p = 0.055); the full model explained 4.8% of the variance (R² = 0.048). However, the descriptive pattern suggested that gender differences decreased at higher levels of religious commitment.
conclusionsFinal-year nursing students exhibited suboptimal attitudes toward end-of-life care, emphasizing the need for enhanced educational strategies. Nursing curricula should incorporate structured and culturally sensitive approaches to address emotional preparedness, communication skills, and reflective learning. Considering gender differences and the potential influence of religiosity may further support the development of effective interventions to improve students' readiness for end-of-life care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.