Trial reportTrials2026
Process evaluation of the randomized trial-"Care management for older people with cognitive impairment during and after hospitalisation in Germany (intersec-CM)".
Trial report in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03359408 (Supporting Elderly People With Cognitive Impairment During and After Hospital Stays- Intersectoral Care Management [Verbundprojekt Intersec-CM - sektorenübergreifendes Care Management Zur Unterstützung Kognitiv beeinträchtigter Menschen während Und Nach Einem Krankenhausaufenthalt]), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Supporting Elderly People With Cognitive Impairment During and After Hospital Stays- Intersectoral Care Management [Verbundprojekt Intersec-CM - sektorenübergreifendes Care Management Zur Unterstützung Kognitiv beeinträchtigter Menschen während Und Nach Einem Krankenhausaufenthalt]
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEffective care of people with cognitive impairment and their families depends, among other things, on the cooperation of the professionals involved in their care. An effective dementia care management support model for people with dementia and their families for the outpatient sector has been further developed for ambulatory and hospital settings. The intersec-CM randomized controlled trial (RCT) implemented this intersectoral care management (iCM) model into routine care in three hospitals in Bielefeld and Greifswald (Germany). Care managers (CMs) trained in advance for the study used a computer-based information management system (IMS) to assess patients' health and care needs and to develop individualized care plans. The iCM aimed to improve hospital-to-primary-care transitions and ensure cross-sectoral care. This was accompanied by a process evaluation to complement the data collected in the RCT. The aim was to understand how the complex intervention works in the selected real-world setting. This paper presents the results of this process evaluation.
methodsFor the process evaluation, a mixed-method design was chosen and applied. The evaluation was based on the guidelines of the British Medical Research Council for the implementation and process evaluation of complex interventions (MRC framework). A method triangulation was conducted consisting of several successive phases (t1: qualitative, t2: quantitative, t3: qualitative).
resultsThe sample (t1: individual interviews n = 30, t2: survey n = 177, t3: individual interviews n = 33) consisted of patients and their relatives, clinical physicians, social workers, carers, general practitioners, care managers (CMs), and project management. The process evaluation showed that intersectoral iCM could be implemented in the hospitals. The CMs were partially successful in assessing needs, developing individual treatment plans, and coordinating and monitoring the needs of people with cognitive impairment and their families. They found it difficult to work with the different actors in the healthcare system because of the rigid daily routines and lack of time in the clinics. Overall, the results show that (1) people with cognitive impairment and their families can benefit from the intervention and (2) iCM can help with the flow of information between health professionals.
conclusionsThe present process evaluation underlines the necessity and meaningfulness of process evaluations to understand the functionality and procedural feasibility of an RCT. Through the study, significant insights into the "black box" of the implementation of the iCM intervention could be gained.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03359408. The trial was registered on December 2, 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.