ArticleScientific reports2026
Optimal integration of electric vehicle charging stations and distributed generator in microgrids using bio-inspired optimization techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prompt adoption of Electric Vehicles (EVs) offers substantial challenges to modern power distribution systems, incorporating enlarged power demand, voltage variability, and elevated energy losses. To solve such problems, this paper proposes an integrated optimization scheme for the simultaneous allocation of EV Charging Stations (EVCSs) and Distributed Generators (DGs) within a microgrid. Using the IEEE 33-bus radial distribution network as a test case, an objective problem is expressed for reducing active power loss and voltage variation while increasing the Voltage Stability Index (VSI). The proposed framework is solved using three metaheuristic algorithms: the novel Walrus Optimization Algorithm (WaOA), alongside the well-established Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA). Simulations across various scenarios reveal that uncoordinated EVCS integration severely degrades system performance, whereas the optimal co-placement of EVCSs and DGs dramatically enhances operational efficiency. The WaOA consistently demonstrated superior performance, notably in a scenario with three optimally placed DGs, achieving a 53.79% reduction in active power losses (from 202.53 kW to 93.59 kW) and a 50.44% reduction in reactive power losses. In addition, it significantly enhanced the voltage profile, boosted the minimum VSI from 0.6956 to 0.92721, and reduced the lowest voltage deviation to 0.000128 p.u. Comparative study confirms that WaOA outperforms PSO and WOA in both convergence speed and solution quality. This study underscores the critical importance of coordinated planning for EVCS and DG integration, providing a robust strategy to enhance grid reliability and support the sustainable transition to electric mobility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.