Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668309›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026

Prospective validation of a urine-based proteomics test for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients.

Ana C Morillo, Kirubel Nigusu Jobre, Guillermo Lendinez Cano, Ana Blanca-Pedregosa, Daniel Lopez Ruiz, Jose Parada, Isabel Heidegger, Zoran Culig, Antonio Lopez-Beltran, Julia Carrasco-Valiente and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ana C Morillo *Maimonides Institute of Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba (UCO), Department of Urology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
Kirubel Nigusu Jobre *Department of Biomarker Research, Mosaiques diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
Guillermo Lendinez CanoDepartment of Urology, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital/ IBiS, Seville, Spain.
Ana Blanca-PedregosaMaimonides Institute of Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba (UCO), Department of Urology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
Daniel Lopez RuizMaimonides Institute of Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba (UCO), Department of Radiology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
Jose ParadaDepartment of Radiology, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital/ IBiS, Seville, Spain.
Isabel HeideggerMedical University of Innsbruck, Department of Urology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Zoran CuligMedical University of Innsbruck, Department of Urology, Innsbruck, Austria.
Antonio Lopez-BeltranDepartment of Pathology, University of Cordoba (UCO), Cordoba, Spain.
Julia Carrasco-ValienteMaimonides Institute of Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba (UCO), Department of Urology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
Harald MischakDepartment of Biomarker Research, Mosaiques diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
Rafael A MedinaDepartment of Urology, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital/ IBiS, Seville, Spain.
Juan P Campos HernandezMaimonides Institute of Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba (UCO), Department of Urology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
Maria FrantziDepartment of Biomarker Research, Mosaiques diagnostics GmbH, Hannover, Germany.
Enrique Gómez GómezMaimonides Institute of Biomedical Research of Cordoba (IMIBIC), University of Cordoba (UCO), Department of Urology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain. enrique.gomez.gomez.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8753-3306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveProstate cancer (PCa) remains a major health burden, while existing diagnostic approaches are limited by overdiagnosis that leads to unnecessary biopsies, and by underdetection of clinically significant disease (csPCa). This study aims to prospectively validate a urine-based 19-biomarker model (19-BM) using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) for predicting csPCa in patients at risk.

methodsOne hundred sixty-one biopsy-naïve patients at risk for csPCa underwent pre-biopsy CE-MS analysis in urine, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and biopsy at two major hospitals. The 19-BM performance was assessed in comparison with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA), the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), and mpMRI. Performance metrics included Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive values. One hundred patients receiving radical prostatectomy were evaluated to investigate the correlation of the 19-BM scores with the prostatectomy pathology. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The 19-BM scores achieved an AUC of 0.79, outperforming PSA (AUC 0.54, p < 0.0001), ERSPC (AUC 0.63, p = 0.0108), PSAD (AUC 0.61, p = 0.0021) and mpMRI (AUC 0.65, p = 0.0069). In patients with low Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores (PI-RADS), 19-BM showed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 90%. Prospective validation of a previous nomogram combining 19-BM with mpMRI yielded an AUC of 0.82 (with specificity of 90%, sensitivity 64%).

conclusionsAfter prospective validation, the 19-BM demonstrates robust performance in predicting csPCa. The urine-based 19BM can serve as a valuable complement to current diagnostic methods, potentially reducing the need for unnecessary invasive procedures, also when combined with mpMRI.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.