ArticleBritish journal of cancer2026
Prospective validation of a urine-based proteomics test for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveProstate cancer (PCa) remains a major health burden, while existing diagnostic approaches are limited by overdiagnosis that leads to unnecessary biopsies, and by underdetection of clinically significant disease (csPCa). This study aims to prospectively validate a urine-based 19-biomarker model (19-BM) using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) for predicting csPCa in patients at risk.
methodsOne hundred sixty-one biopsy-naïve patients at risk for csPCa underwent pre-biopsy CE-MS analysis in urine, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and biopsy at two major hospitals. The 19-BM performance was assessed in comparison with Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA), the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), and mpMRI. Performance metrics included Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive values. One hundred patients receiving radical prostatectomy were evaluated to investigate the correlation of the 19-BM scores with the prostatectomy pathology. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: The 19-BM scores achieved an AUC of 0.79, outperforming PSA (AUC 0.54, p < 0.0001), ERSPC (AUC 0.63, p = 0.0108), PSAD (AUC 0.61, p = 0.0021) and mpMRI (AUC 0.65, p = 0.0069). In patients with low Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores (PI-RADS), 19-BM showed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 90%. Prospective validation of a previous nomogram combining 19-BM with mpMRI yielded an AUC of 0.82 (with specificity of 90%, sensitivity 64%).
conclusionsAfter prospective validation, the 19-BM demonstrates robust performance in predicting csPCa. The urine-based 19BM can serve as a valuable complement to current diagnostic methods, potentially reducing the need for unnecessary invasive procedures, also when combined with mpMRI.
Identifiers
42668309What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.