Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42668296›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Self-supervised learning yields representational signatures of category-selective cortex.

Daniel Janini, Radoslaw Cichy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel JaniniNeural Dynamics of Visual Cognition Group, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany. janinidp@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4776-8730
Radoslaw CichyNeural Dynamics of Visual Cognition Group, Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4190-6071

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) CI 241/1-3, CI 241/1-7, INST 272/297-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ventral visual stream contains category-selective regions with distinct feature tuning, most prominently the fusiform face area (FFA) and parahippocampal place area (PPA). Why do these brain regions exhibit distinct tuning properties? Recent work suggests that brain-like category-selective features emerge from a general visual learning mechanism without domain-specific biases. Here, we test this proposal by applying a functional localizer approach to both humans and self-supervised neural networks, identifying face- and scene-selective units in the brain and in models. We then compared fMRI and model responses across a broad stimulus set probing classic representational signatures of the FFA and PPA, including preferences relating to curvature, animacy, real-world size, mid-level features, face shapes, and spatial layout information. Category-selective model units largely recapitulate the distinct representational signatures of category-selective brain regions, capturing most of the effects in our test battery. Our findings demonstrate that domain-general learning objectives are sufficient to create humanlike category-selectivity, suggesting that the distinct representational signatures of category-selective cortex may emerge from a unified computational goal akin to self-supervised learning.

Indexed as

LearningSupervised Machine LearningVisual CortexBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationRepresentation Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID42668296
PMCPMC13526027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.