ArticleCell reports2026
Inferential planning in the frontal cortex.
Article in Cell reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How the brain plans and maintains sequences of future actions remains a central question in systems neuroscience. Studies in the frontal cortex revealed that multiple elements of a sequence are represented simultaneously in separable neural subspaces, challenging classical sequential planning models. Here, we show that these representations emerge naturally under inferential planning, in which sequential actions are inferred from sensory evidence and goals. Using a hierarchical generative model, we reproduce key neural phenomena observed in the primate frontal cortex, including the simultaneous activation of multiple plan elements, the emergence of (almost) orthogonal "memory" subspaces, and their reuse across forward and backward tasks. Our approach provides a mechanistic account of how probabilistic inference over control states produces distributed neural representations of plans. This framework unifies planning, working memory, and motor preparation, and generates predictions about the dynamics of active inference, the role of subspaces, and the impact of uncertainty on sequence processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.