Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42667616›Full record

ArticleCell reports2026

Inferential planning in the frontal cortex.

Francesco Donnarumma, Thomas Parr, Karl Friston, James Whittington, Giovanni Pezzulo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesco DonnarummaInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome, Italy.
Thomas ParrNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK.
Karl FristonQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
James WhittingtonDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Giovanni PezzuloInstitute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: giovanni.pezzulo@istc.cnr.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How the brain plans and maintains sequences of future actions remains a central question in systems neuroscience. Studies in the frontal cortex revealed that multiple elements of a sequence are represented simultaneously in separable neural subspaces, challenging classical sequential planning models. Here, we show that these representations emerge naturally under inferential planning, in which sequential actions are inferred from sensory evidence and goals. Using a hierarchical generative model, we reproduce key neural phenomena observed in the primate frontal cortex, including the simultaneous activation of multiple plan elements, the emergence of (almost) orthogonal "memory" subspaces, and their reuse across forward and backward tasks. Our approach provides a mechanistic account of how probabilistic inference over control states produces distributed neural representations of plans. This framework unifies planning, working memory, and motor preparation, and generates predictions about the dynamics of active inference, the role of subspaces, and the impact of uncertainty on sequence processing.

Indexed as

Frontal LobeAnimalsHumansMemory, Short-TermModels, NeurologicalCP: neurosciencefrontal cortexplanningprobabilistic inference

Identifiers

PMID42667616
PMCPMC13597664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.