ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2026
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Peer Support Services in the Veterans Health Administration: Lessons for Healthcare Organizations.
Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To identify strategies that faciliate the implementation adaptation of peer support services to ensure continuity and effectiveness of mental health care during crisis or rapid organizational changes. This is a cross-sectional, qualitative study that was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic with a purposeful sample of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) peer specialists and their supervisors from 11 facilities in a Veteran Integrated Service Network (VISN). Data collection and analysis were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Deductive and inductive thematic analysis approaches were used to analyze the data. VHA peer specialists employed various strategies that incorporated multiple CFIR domains to adapt to the COVID-19 restrictions and rapid organizational changes. Findings indicate that peer specialists as key individuals involved in delivering and implementing peer support services, as well as higher-level, outer setting factors such as patients' needs drove these adaptations. Some strategies and CFIR domains were more influential than others in shaping these adaptations. Three key strategies emerged as potentially useful in future public health crises and rapid organizational changes to expand the capacity of peer specialists' role to meet patients' healthcare needs: 1) adopting a work culture that is receptive to change (learning climate), 2) promoting collaboration (network and collaboration), and 3) fostering peer specialists' self-efficacy (characteristics of the individual). During times of crisis, foundational organizational practices, such as change management techniques and transformational leadership styles, can help support service delivery adaptations and improve care delivery to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.