ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Accelerometers improve detection of movement related artifact in bedside ICU data.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Routinely collected real time data from ICU bedside monitors is a valuable source of information which can assist the clinical team caring for a patient. This data almost always contains artifacts caused by clinical staff attending to the patient throughout the day, e.g. blood samples being taken, body washing, administration of IV medication. We present a small (10 patient) study but with accurately annotated clinical event data constructed by observing standard clinical procedures and merging this information with the physiologic data (ECG, ABP, CVP) from bedside monitors. In addition, to assess the feasibility for using accelerometers in the ICU environment, we received ethical approval to place an accelerometer [1] on the chest of all patients and the X, Y & Z accelerometer plane data was merged with the physiological and event annotation data. The non-trivial methods required to capture the data and initial characterisation of results are detailed and discussed. A baseline model cross-correlating ECG and ABP waveform signals over a 10 s window was developed and features derived from this model were used in both GLM and Random Forest (RF) models for predicting events that routinely cause movement related artifact in waveform quality time-series data. RF model performance improved when accelerometer data was added to the model for most movement related artifact types. For the GLM models, only selected models (ANY Type, Turns, Bed Movement and Blood Sample) showed an improvement in model fit with the addition of the accelerometer data (P < 0.01). Implications for observational ICU research and potential "Closed Loop" clinical modelling studies are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42667584What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.