ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Stable tissue oxygen cerebral perfusion pressure (stoCPP): Proof of concept for a novel method for the assessment of optimum cerebral perfusion pressure in severe traumatic brain injury.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To demonstrate a method for the identification of safe cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury using brain tissue oxygen (PbtO₂) readings as a surrogate marker of cerebral blood flow. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from patients with severe TBI (sTBI). A total of 9 patients with sTBI enrolled in the BONANZA-GT trial with continuous monitoring of mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and PbtO₂. MAP, ICP, CPP and high frequency PbtO₂ signals were continuously recorded. stoCPP was calculated as the coefficient of determination (r²) of short-term changes in PbtO₂ regressed on short-term changes in CPP within non-overlapping 144-second correlation windows, assigned to 5-mmHg CPP bins using a window-median binning approach. Algorithm parameters were optimised using Bayesian optimisation with a composite scoring function benchmarked against CPPopt. Per-subject r² thresholds were derived by block-shuffle calibration (median 0.12, range 0.06-0.26). stoCPP was successfully generated for all 9 patients from raw unfiltered data. The lower limit of the stoCPP range (LLstoCPP) was defined in approximately 22% of analysis windows, as it is identifiable only during episodes of CPP perturbation below the stable range. CPPopt point estimates fell within the stoCPP range in 76.2% of observations, with a mean stoCPP width of 22.8 mmHg. Bland-Altman analysis of lower bounds (n = 102 independent estimates) demonstrated a mean bias of 4.1 mmHg (SD 7.3 mmHg; 95% limits of agreement - 10.1 to + 18.4 mmHg). Trough depth characteristics of the stoCPP range degraded significantly with temporal misalignment of the PbtO₂ signal (Kendall's W = 0.557, p < 0.001), supporting the physiological basis of the method. stoCPP was defined in all patients from raw unfiltered data using Bayesian-optimised parameters and per-subject calibrated r² thresholds, and demonstrated close correspondence with CPPopt. We propose further validation of this method utilising alternative PbtO₂ probe types and larger patient cohorts to assess the validity of time below LLstoCPP as a marker of ischaemia and determinant of outcome in sTBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42667582What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.