ReviewClinical child and family psychology review2026
Family Accommodation in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: A Critical Review of Current Measures and Methodology.
Review in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A growing body of evidence suggests family accommodation (FA) contributes to pediatric anxiety onset, maintenance, and blunted treatment response and has inspired novel treatment approaches. Many measures of FA have been developed in the past two decades, yet their psychometric properties have not been thoroughly examined, compared, and aggregated to inform measurement selection in research and clinical settings. Accurately measuring FA is critical for refining etiological theories of youth anxiety disorders and informing clinical interventions. The current review aims to summarize and critically analyze existing FA measurement tools to inform measure selection and highlight critical weaknesses and areas for future FA measurement research. FA measurements were identified via a search of PsycINFO and PubMed and were evaluated using the criteria for evidence-based assessment (Hunsley & Mash, 2007). Most FA measures demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, suggesting FA measure selection will largely depend upon context, available resources, intended use, and FA subdomains of interest. FA measurement will benefit from additional research using longitudinal methods and more diverse samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42667568What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.