ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2026
What you don't see matters: dual-energy CT in emergency radiology.
Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) represents a technological breakthrough in diagnostic imaging, offering the unique ability to characterize and differentiate tissues. This review analyzes the expanding role of DECT within emergency radiology, highlighting how its added value over conventional CT improves decision-making in acute clinical settings. In emergency neuroradiology, DECT allows for a critical distinction between acute intracranial hemorrhage and iodinated contrast extravasation. In vascular emergencies, it optimizes the evaluation of the arterial tree and is crucial for the timely diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism through iodine perfusion maps that identify subtle filling defects. In acute abdominal imaging, DECT improves the characterization of traumatic or inflammatory lesions and enables precise chemical mapping of renal calculi, differentiating uric acid from calcium oxalate to guide immediate therapy. Finally, in emergency musculoskeletal imaging, calcium suppression algorithms accurately visualize bone marrow edema, helping to detect occult fractures and acute traumatic injuries. In conclusion, DECT has transitioned from a research tool to an essential asset in emergency radiology. By significantly enhancing diagnostic accuracy and streamlining workflows, DECT optimizes patient triage and management in time-critical acute scenarios across multiple anatomical regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42667564What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.