ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2026
Emerging frontiers and challenges of artificial intelligence in PSMA-PET imaging: pioneering a new chapter in prostate cancer care.
Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has become pivotal in prostate cancer (PCa) management, offering superior sensitivity over conventional imaging for detecting tumors, metastases, and biochemical recurrence. However, interpretive subjectivity, workflow inefficiencies, and heterogeneous PSMA expression remain significant limitations. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly radiomics and deep learning, addresses these challenges by enabling automated lesion analysis and image enhancement. This review examines the impact of AI across the PSMA-PET workflow, covering optimized image acquisition (e.g., low-dose protocols, motion correction), enhanced interpretation (e.g., lesion characterization, prognostic stratification), and personalized theranostics (e.g., treatment response forecasting, radioligand therapy dosimetry). Despite promising multicenter validation, challenges remain in annotation standardization, data heterogeneity, model generalizability, interpretability, regulatory integration, and ethics. We further discuss emerging frontiers, including multimodal multi-omic integration, generative AI, and AI-driven clinical decision support systems. Notably, we highlight the evolving role of nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists as integrators of AI-derived biomarkers, who validate AI outputs for high-stakes decisions, retain interpretive authority for complex cases, and oversee quality assurance, ensuring that AI augments rather than replaces specialist expertise. These advances position AI-integrated PSMA-PET to drive precision oncology, with key pathways outlined for clinical translation and future innovation in PCa care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42667563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.