Mapping the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) and Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) to the EQ-5D-5L in diabetes care.

purposeTo develop and validate mapping algorithms that estimate EQ-5D health state utility values (HSUVs) from two diabetes-specific patient-reported outcome measures, the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) and Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), to support economic evaluations when EQ-5D data are unavailable.

methodsData from 662 adults with diabetes in Germany included PAID-20, DDS-17, and EQ-5D-5L responses. Direct mapping models predicted EQ-5D utilities using Tobit and censored least absolute deviation (CLAD) regressions, while indirect mapping models used proportional and partial proportional odds regressions to predict EQ-5D dimensions. Six model specifications were tested, incorporating PAID and DDS items with covariates (age, sex, diabetes type), with selection of predictors guided by item correlations and backward stepwise procedure to retain statistically relevant variables. Model performance was assessed using a selection of performance metrics including root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). Internal validation of the models employed 10-fold cross-validation.

resultsThe strongest-performing direct mapping models consisted of a model with a selection of PAID-20 items and covariates (Tobit regression; RMSE: 0.159; MAE: 0.117) and a model that incorporated PAID-20, DDS-17, and covariates (CLAD regression; RMSE: 0.146; MAE: 0.09), and a model based on DDS-17 items and covariates (Tobit regression; RMSE: 0.164; MAE: 0.121). Indirect mapping models demonstrated higher prediction errors overall (RMSE: 0.187-0.21; MAE: 0.124-0.141) than their counterparts.

conclusionsWe present novel algorithms that enable estimation of EQ-5D utilities from PAID and DDS scores, facilitating economic evaluation in diabetes. Preferred models demonstrated predictive accuracy comparable to published mapping studies.