Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42667503›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2026

Dendritic U-Net for robust vascular wall segmentation in ultrasound imaging.

Kazuki Nagura, Masaaki Omura, Hongpeng Wang, Ryoya Kodaira, Yuuri Hamai, Yusuke Sato, Zihang Zhang, Zhenyu Lei, Hideyuki Hasegawa, Shangce Gao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kazuki NaguraGraduate School of Science and Engineering, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama, 930-8555, Japan. m24c1027@ems.u-toyama.ac.jp.
Masaaki OmuraFaculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama, 930-8555, Japan. momura@eng.u-toyama.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4432-8548
Hongpeng WangFaculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama, 930-8555, Japan.
Ryoya KodairaGraduate School of Science and Engineering, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama, 930-8555, Japan.
Yuuri HamaiGraduate School of Science and Engineering, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama, 930-8555, Japan.
Yusuke SatoGraduate School of Science and Engineering, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama, 930-8555, Japan.
Zihang ZhangFaculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama, 930-8555, Japan.
Zhenyu LeiFaculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama, 930-8555, Japan.
Hideyuki HasegawaFaculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama, 930-8555, Japan.
Shangce GaoFaculty of Engineering, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku, Toyama, 930-8555, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant Number 23K17225Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant Number 25K03179Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant Number 25K21298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe proposed a method that combines the deep learning model U-Net with a dendritic neuron model (DNM) and demonstrated its effectiveness for more robust extraction of vascular wall boundaries through analysis using ultrasound simulations and in vivo carotid artery data.

methodsDendritic U-Net (DU-Net) is a model that replaces the output layer of U-Net with a DNM. Its accuracy was compared to U-Net using cross-validation on a dataset generated by ultrasound simulation. The applicability of the model trained on the simulation dataset to clinical data was also verified using an in vivo dataset of a healthy human carotid artery. The noise robustness of the results was evaluated using the mean absolute difference (MAD) within the scanline and frame of the extracted vessel wall boundaries from the segmentation map.

resultsCross-validation using the simulation data showed that DU-Net achieved higher accuracy than U-Net in terms of precision (93.64%), Dice (96.38%), and Intersection over Union (93.01%). Furthermore, evaluation of the MAD of the extracted vessel wall boundaries from the in vivo data demonstrated that DU-Net produced smoother boundaries than U-Net.

conclusionIncorporating DNM into U-Net suppresses the impact of noise on vessel wall boundary extraction, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed DU-Net method for vessel wall boundary extraction.

Indexed as

Dendritic learningImage segmentationUltrasound simulationU-NetVascular wall

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.