Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42667488›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026

Passive acoustic monitoring as a tool for early detection of invasive animal species: a systematic review and a case study.

David Becker, Marit Kinga Kasten, Torben Weber, Ingo Grass, Thomas Hiller

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David Becker *Ecology of Tropical Agricultural Systems, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 13, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany. d.becker@uni-hohenheim.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3339-3430
Marit Kinga Kasten *Ecology of Tropical Agricultural Systems, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 13, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4412-7283
Torben WeberCenter for Biodiversity and Integrative Taxonomy (KomBioTa), University of Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0236-7083
Ingo GrassEcology of Tropical Agricultural Systems, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 13, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7788-1940
Thomas HillerEcology of Tropical Agricultural Systems, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstraße 13, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4044-9956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive animal species are spreading rapidly across the globe, creating an urgent need for efficient early-detection and monitoring tools. Passive acoustic monitoring has become an established method in biodiversity research, but its application to invasive species monitoring has been less systematically explored. Here, we combine a systematic literature review with a field-based case study to evaluate the potential of passive acoustic monitoring for invasive animal detection. We identified 26 studies on acoustic monitoring of invasive animals, mainly addressing amphibians (11 studies), birds and fish (five each) with most studies from the USA and Australia. The use of acoustic monitoring of invasive species has increased during the past decade, with recent studies applying automated detection, machine learning, and large-scale monitoring frameworks. As a case study, we further tested the feasibility of low-cost acoustic monitoring of the invasive American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus or Aquarana catesbeiana) in southwestern Germany, combined with automated identification using BirdNET. We successfully confirmed bullfrog presence in five of the eleven monitored lakes, including sites close to protected nature reserves. Our results highlight the growing potential of passive acoustic monitoring of invasive species under field conditions. In combination with automated species detection, manual validation, and emerging real-time monitoring devices, passive acoustic monitoring becomes an increasingly powerful tool for early intervention and scalable management of biological invasions.

Indexed as

AcousticsEnvironmental MonitoringIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsBiodiversityBirdsConservation of Natural ResourcesFishesAmerican bullfrogAmphibianBiological invasionExotic speciesNature conservationSoundscape

Identifiers

PMID42667488
PMCPMC13525962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.