Observational studyInternational ophthalmology2026
Home-based low-level light therapy using a commercial LED mask for dry eye disease.
Observational study in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLight-based therapies, including low-level light therapy (LLLT), have recently emerged as promising non-invasive approaches for dry eye disease (DED). This study evaluates the impact of a consumer-grade home-based LED Beauty Mask on DED parameters.
methodsThis retrospective observational cohort study included 20 postmenopausal women (20 eyes) diagnosed with moderate DED and MGD who underwent cosmetic treatment using the LED Beauty Mask Koled®. The device was used for 20-min sessions on alternate days over a 3-week period. Clinical evaluations were performed at baseline, 3 weeks (T1), and 2 weeks (T2) after the last treatment and included tear osmolarity, tear film break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I test, corneal fluorescein staining, and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI).
resultsTear osmolarity demonstrated a significant improvement over time (P < 0.001), with the most pronounced change observed at T1. Tear film stability, assessed by TBUT, also improved significantly (P = 0.001). Subjective symptoms measured by OSDI showed a significant and sustained reduction (P < 0.001). No significant changes were observed in Schirmer I test values (P = 0.29). Corneal fluorescein staining present at baseline resolved by the final follow-up. Four eyes (20%) exhibited osmolarity values below the measurable range after treatment. No discomfort or adverse events were reported.
conclusionsThis study suggests that a cosmetic LED mask may provide symptomatic and functional improvement in DED when repurposed for ocular use. Although preliminary and limited by sample size, these findings support further investigation through controlled clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.