Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42667419›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2026

Expected costs and benefits of genetic counselling and germline genetic testing in metastatic prostate cancer.

Michiel Vlaming, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney, Wouter Koole, Inge M van Oort, Eveline M A Bleiker, Margreet G E M Ausems, Geert W J Frederix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michiel VlamingDepartment of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lambertus A L M KiemeneyDepartment of Urology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Wouter KooleDepartment of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Inge M van OortDepartment of Urology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eveline M A BleikerDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Margreet G E M AusemsDepartment of Genetics, Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. M.G.E.M.Ausems@umcutrecht.nl.
Geert W J FrederixDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Economics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 12601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying pathogenic germline variants in men with metastatic prostate cancer is important for therapeutic options and for identifying relatives who may have a high cancer risk. To keep genetic testing costs manageable, it is important to identify which patients should be selected for testing. In this study, we compared expected costs and number of identified pathogenic variants in two scenarios: offering genetic testing to all men with metastatic prostate cancer versus testing only those with additional risk factors linked to a higher likelihood of carrying a pathogenic variant. Costs were evaluated with a mainstream genetic testing pathway, where testing is discussed by a non-genetic healthcare professional. Using Dutch national incidence data, predefined healthcare cost frameworks, and a hypothetical assumption for the acceptance rate of patients, we modelled total costs for the Netherlands and number of identified pathogenic variants for each approach. The costs of genetic testing and post-test counselling decreased threefold when applying selection criteria, compared to the scenario where all metastatic prostate cancer patients are eligible. However, applying selection criteria would result in missing 41% clinically relevant pathogenic germline variants that would otherwise be identified. This implies that, at national level, a discussion should be started regarding willingness to pay for identifying pathogenic germline variants.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationProstatic NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHealth Care CostsHumansMaleNeoplasm MetastasisNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID42667419
PMCPMC13526062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.