Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42667373›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2026

Initial surgical results of subcostal uniportal robotic lung resection: a study of the perioperative outcomes and a CUSUM analysis of the learning curve.

Teruhisa Kawaguchi, Fumiaki Watanabe, Shinji Kaneda, Daisuke Ito, Koji Kawaguchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Teruhisa KawaguchiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Mie University, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, 514-8507, Mie, Japan.
Fumiaki WatanabeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Mie University, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, 514-8507, Mie, Japan.
Shinji KanedaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Mie University, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, 514-8507, Mie, Japan.
Daisuke ItoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Mie University, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, 514-8507, Mie, Japan.
Koji KawaguchiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Mie University, 2-174, Edobashi, Tsu, 514-8507, Mie, Japan. k-gucci@med.mie-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnatomical lung resection using the da Vinci SP system was recently introduced in Japan. We retrospectively evaluated our initial experience and analyzed the learning curve for the first 53 consecutive cases.

methodsFifty-three patients with primary lung cancer underwent anatomical resection, including lobectomy and segmentectomy, using the da Vinci SP system. We reviewed the perioperative outcomes, including the operative time, console time, conversion rates, and complications. The learning curves for operative and console times were assessed using a cumulative summation analysis.

resultsThe mean patient age was 71.5 years. Thirty-five and 18 patients underwent lobectomy and segmentectomy, respectively. The mean operative and console times were 207.1 min and 147.5 min, respectively. Two patients (4%) required conversion to an open thoracotomy. Two patients (4%) experienced Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ II postoperative complications, with no severe morbidity. A cumulative summation analysis indicated that the learning curve for lobectomy plateaued after the 14th case, whereas proficiency for all resections was achieved after 18-19 cases.

conclusionAnatomical lung resection using the da Vinci SP system can be safely performed with favorable short-term outcomes. Surgeons with experience in multiport robotics may achieve proficiency in approximately 14-18 cases.

Indexed as

Learning curveRobotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgerySingle-port robotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID42667373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.