Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42667347›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026

Pachymetric Thresholds for Keratoconus Progression Based on MS-39 Measurement Precision.

Rui Ning, Yiran Wang, Xinning Yang, Xiaomin Huang, Jiawei Li, Giacomo Savini, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello, Xingtao Zhou, Jinhai Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rui Ning *Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Yiran Wang *Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xinning YangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Xiaomin HuangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jiawei LiEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Giacomo SaviniG.B. Bietti Foundation I.R.C.C.S., Rome, Italy.
Domenico Schiano-LomorielloG.B. Bietti Foundation I.R.C.C.S., Rome, Italy.
Xingtao ZhouEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jinhai HuangEye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University; NHC Key laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases; Key Laboratory of Myopia and Related Eye Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shanghai, China. vip999vip@163.com.

Funding

Fund of Fudan University and Cao'ejiang Basic Research 24FCA16National Health Commission National Key Clinical Specialty Construction Project Z155080000004Scientific Research Fund of the Education Department of Yunnan Province 2026J0021the Clinical Research Program of the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission 202540083the Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University High-level Talents Programme Grant No. 2021318Yunnan University Medical Research Foundation YDYXJJ2025-0057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the precision of pachymetry determined using the MS-39 device across different levels of keratoconus (KC) and to establish thresholds for detecting disease progression.

methodsThis study examined 27, 29, 34 and 41 eyes with forme fruste keratoconus (FFKC), mild KC, moderate KC and severe KC, respectively. To assess repeatability, single-measurement and three-measurement reproducibility, three consecutive measurements were obtained with the MS-39 by two well-trained operators. The within-subject standard deviation (S

resultsThe MS-39 demonstrated high repeatability and reproducibility in measuring corneal thickness in KC patients, with all ICC values exceeding 0.90. Based on precision analyses, the following critical values for the thinnest corneal thickness are recommended: for FFKC, mild, moderate and severe KC stages, thresholds should be set at 4.43, 6.58, 8.34 and 16.71 µm, respectively, when using triple-averaged measurements. Conversely, for single measurements, the corresponding thresholds are 6.68, 10.89, 10.20 and 23.31 µm. Exceeding these values should prompt careful re-evaluation of measurement error or progression of the disease.

conclusionsThe MS-39 had high repeatability and reproducibility across different levels of KC severity. Given the corneal irregularity in KC, averaging three measurements may improve reliability and reduce errors in clinical decision-making. Moreover, grading KC patients accurately and applying different thresholds is an effective approach.

Indexed as

KeratoconusPlacido-diskPrecisionSD-OCTThresholds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.