ArticleBrain structure & function2026
Inter-brain coupling during naturalistic collaborative Tangram solving in child dyads: an exploratory fNIRS hyperscanning study.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Collaborative problem solving plays a central role in children's cognitive and social development, yet how neural activity relates to real-time peer coordination remains poorly understood. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning, we simultaneously recorded brain activity from 15 dyads of school-aged children during a naturalistic Tangram puzzle task, including rest, solo problem-solving, observation, and collaboration. We examined task-related neural activation and inter-brain connectivity (IBC) to assess how interpersonal neural dynamics relate to task context and behavior. No prespecified region-of-interest activation effect survived correction for multiple comparisons. At the exploratory channel level, a posterior-parietal channel showed a positive HbO response during collaboration relative to baseline. The global IBC did not differ significantly across experimental conditions, indicating that inter-brain synchrony was not determined solely by collaboration or social presence. Nevertheless, an exploratory association between global HbO coupling during Duo and total manual activity showed a relevant magnitude (Spearman rho = 0.581), a bootstrap 95% confidence interval excluding zero [0.038, 0.891], positive coefficients in every leave-one-dyad-out analysis, and a similar magnitude after excluding the first 8 s of each block (rho = .538), although it did not meet the FDR threshold across the broader sensitivity family, q = 0.131. Building on the emerging literature on dual-child portable fNIRS hyperscanning, the study reinforces the viability of this approach in an ecologically valid, hands-on task and suggests that block-wise inter-brain coupling may capture meaningful variation in dyad-level behavioral engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.