ArticleRheumatology international2026
Clinical characteristics, organ damage and survival in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a long-term retrospective cohort study.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To compare the clinical phenotype, organ damage, and survival of patients with antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS) and other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (OIIM) in a long-term, single-center retrospective cohort. We retrospectively analyzed patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy who fulfilled the Bohan and Peter criteria, the EULAR/ACR classification criteria and had available myositis specific autoantibody results. This cohort comprises patients followed in our autoimmune connective tissue disease clinic between 1991-2024. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, autoantibody, organ damage, and survival data were compared between ASyS and OIIM groups. Myositis Damage Index was used for assessing organ damage at the sixth month of follow-up and the last visit. Of the 122 patients, 35 (28.7%) were classified as ASyS (85.7% female) and 87 as OIIM (59.8% female). Median age at diagnosis was 47 and 46 years, respectively. The mean follow-up duration of the overall cohort was 84.48 ± 77.95 months. Among patients with ASyS, anti-Jo-1 was the most frequent autoantibody detected (88.6%), followed by anti-PL-7 in 8.6% and anti-KS in 2.8%. Mechanic's hands, arthritis, and interstitial lung disease were more frequent in the ASyS group. Dysphagia was more frequent in the OIIM group (ASyS: 8.6%; OIIM: 37.9%, p = 0.003). Anti-Ro-52 positivity was more common in ASyS than in OIIM (ASyS: 42.9%, OIIM: 21.8%, p = 0.034). C-reactive protein, leukocyte, and neutrophil levels were higher in the ASyS group at baseline. The median Myositis Damage Index score at the sixth month was nominally higher in ASyS than in OIIM (median MDI: 3 vs. 2, p = 0.046). However, MDI scores were comparable between the two groups at the last assessment. In autoantibody-based subgroup analyses, higher early damage scores were observed in ASyS than in anti-TIF1γ-positive patients (median MDI = 3 vs 1.5, p = 0.033). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) was more frequently present in ASyS, whereas malignancy was more frequent among anti-TIF1γ-positive patients. The mortality rate was 14.3% in the ASyS group and 14.9% in the OIIM group. Survival analysis did not reveal a statistically significant difference at the end of the follow-up between ASyS and OIIM groups. In this long-term retrospective cohort, patients with ASyS showed a distinct clinical phenotype compared with OIIM. Sixth-month MDI scores were nominally higher in ASyS and may partly reflect the higher burden of ILD; however, MDI subdomain analyses were not available. No statistically significant difference in survival was detected between groups, although this finding should be interpreted cautiously because of the small number of deaths. Overall, these findings should be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger multicenter prospective cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42667319What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.