ArticleMusculoskeletal care2026
Exploration of Physiotherapists' Understanding and Application of Safety Netting Procedures in France-A Qualitative Study.
Article in Musculoskeletal care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysiotherapists in primary care frequently manage patients with musculoskeletal disorders that may conceal serious underlying pathologies, leading to diagnostic uncertainty. Although safety netting is recommended to enhance diagnostic reasoning and ensure patient safety, its conceptualisation and implementation in physiotherapy remain poorly understood. PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore how physiotherapists understand and apply safety netting in clinical practice, with particular attention to diagnostic uncertainty, patient safety and interprofessional collaboration.
methodsA generic qualitative study was undertaken in France. Twenty-eight (28) physiotherapists were purposively recruited to achieve maximum variation in clinical experience, practice setting and postgraduate training. Semi-structured interviews were analysed using an inductive reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsAn interpretive typology comprising three diagnostic uncertainty scenarios (controlled, manageable and challenging uncertainty), was developed. The typology shows that safety netting implementation is shaped by the interaction between clinical expertise, organisational support, interprofessional collaboration and access to healthcare resources. Controlled uncertainty was characterised by integrated support systems that facilitated confident clinical decision-making, whereas challenging uncertainty reflected fragmented care pathways, limited resources and reduced confidence in managing serious underlying pathologies. Across all scenarios, participants framed safety netting as a dynamic patient-centred framework, integrating clinical assessment, clinical reasoning, patient education, follow-up planning and referral decision-making.
conclusionsIn physiotherapy, safety netting appears to be a context-dependent approach to managing diagnostic uncertainty rather than a standardised procedure. The proposed typology provides a conceptual framework for understanding how individual, professional and organisational factors interact to shape safety netting implementation, with implications for physiotherapy education, interprofessional collaboration and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.