Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42667138›Full record

ReviewJournal of environmental quality

Whole orchard recycling in California's Central Valley: Benefits, management, and adoption.

C Mae Culumber, Brent Holtz, Suduan Gao, Amisha Poret-Peterson, Touyee Thao, Cameron Zuber, Franz Niederholzer, Mohammad Yaghmour, Diana Camarena-Onofre, Daniel Rivers and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

C Mae CulumberUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cooperative Extension, Fresno, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8970-7461
Brent HoltzUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cooperative Extension, Stockton, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6019-0631
Suduan GaoUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, Water Management Research Unit, Parlier, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7945-1925
Amisha Poret-PetersonUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Crops Pathology and Genetics Research Unit, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7329-5175
Touyee ThaoUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cooperative Extension, Fresno, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3280-7728
Cameron ZuberUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cooperative Extension, Merced, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8064-6738
Franz NiederholzerUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cooperative Extension, Colusa, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6807-2512
Mohammad YaghmourUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cooperative Extension, Bakersfield, California, USA.
Diana Camarena-OnofreUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cooperative Extension, Fresno, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0213-503X
Daniel RiversUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cooperative Extension, Stockton, California, USA.
Greg BrowneUnited States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Crops Pathology and Genetics Research Unit, Davis, California, USA.
Benjamin T HalleckUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Cooperative Extension, Stockton, California, USA.

Funding

Almond Board of California AIR10Almond Board of California INSH06California Department of Food and Agriculture 17-0614-000-HSCalifornia Department of Food and Agriculture 19-0001-022-SFCalifornia Department of Food and Agriculture 20-0001-040-SFUSDA ARS Research Associate Award, Class of 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole orchard recycling (WOR) has become a common practice in California (CA) orchards and vineyards due to declining options for agricultural biomass disposal. WOR is the process by which entire orchards or vineyards are shredded into chips, spread onto the soil surface, and incorporated into the soil before replanting a new crop. The paper summarizes current knowledge on WOR's impact on soils, crops, and the environment and outlines efforts to promote large-scale adoption across California. From 2008 to 2019, field trials were established at eight sites in the Central Valley to identify best management guidelines and measure changes in soil health, environment, and replanted orchard performance over time. Biomass incorporation ranged from 56 to 191 metric tons ha

Indexed as

AgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesRecyclingBiomassCaliforniaCrops, AgriculturalSoilSoil

Identifiers

PMID42667138
PMCPMC13525571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.