ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Molecular and Clinical Analyses of 111 Patients with Bilateral Anterior-Segment Dysgenesis/Aniridia and Microphthalmia/Anophthalmia.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To clarify the molecular and clinical characteristics of anterior-segment dysgenesis (ASD)/aniridia and microphthalmia/anophthalmia caused by monogenic variants. Design: Clinical and genetic analyses of a large cohort of patients with bilateral ocular lesions. Participants: A total of 111 patients and their family members were recruited through a multicenter collaborative study in Japan. Methods: Next-generation sequencing using custom-designed panels for 11 and 12 major causative genes for ASD/aniridia and microphthalmia/anophthalmia, respectively. We analyzed the clinical information of patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. Main Outcome Measures: Collated genetic results and clinical data. Results: We achieved genetic diagnosis rates of 50.0% for ASD/aniridia and 37.5% for microphthalmia/anophthalmia. We identified 11 previously unreported variants. De novo variants in the Conclusions: This study provides evidence that targeted gene panel approaches are useful for the clinical diagnosis of ASD/aniridia and microphthalmia/anophthalmia. Our data clarified the mutation spectrum and phenotypic characteristics of these disorders caused by monogenic variants. This study confirmed that various phenotypes classified as ASD, such as Peters anomaly and Axenfeld anomaly, constitute a group of disorders on the same spectrum, may overlap with aniridia, and exhibit genetic heterogeneity. The findings, which demonstrate an association between genotypes and complications, are expected to contribute to better management and care for children with these rare intractable eye diseases. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.