ArticleMethodsX2026
Biomechanical and functional performance differences in individuals with and without pes planus: A systematic review and modified GRADE evidence synthesis protocol.
Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pes planus (flat foot) is characterized by a reduction of the medial longitudinal arch and alterations in foot biomechanics that may influence gait, balance, and functional performance. However, existing evidence regarding its biomechanical and functional consequences remains inconsistent. This systematic review aims to examine differences in biomechanics and functional performance among individuals with pes planus and those with normal arches. Methods: This review will include individuals of any age, sex, diagnosed with pes planus using validated criteria, compared with individuals with normal foot arches. Observational and experimental studies reporting biomechanical or functional outcomes will be included. Primary outcomes will comprise biomechanical measures, including kinematic, kinetic, spatiotemporal, plantar pressure, and muscle activity measures. Secondary outcomes will include, but not be limited to, functional performance measures such as balance and agility. A systematic search will be conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, EMBASE, and CINAHL, supplemented by grey literature searches in ProQuest, OpenGrey, and Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers will perform study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment using the Downs and Black index. Effect sizes will be reported as standardized mean differences or odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and the certainty of evidence will be evaluated using a modified GRADE approach. Systematic review registration number: CRD420261331845.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.