ArticleJournal of structural biology: X2026
Characterization of energy filtering slit widths for MicroED data collection.
Article in Journal of structural biology: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recovering high-resolution information using energy filtering in MicroED.Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A favorable signal-to-noise ratio is essential for obtaining high-quality diffraction data in macromolecular electron crystallography. Inelastic scattering contributes significantly to the noise, reducing contrast between diffraction peaks and background, which complicates peak detection and compromises the accuracy of intensity integration. Energy filtering mitigates these challenges and enhances diffraction data quality by removing inelastically scattered electrons, leading to reduced background noise and sharper Bragg peaks. Previously, we reported a substantial improvement in MicroED data quality and resolution with energy filtering. Here, we systematically evaluate the impact of different energy filter slit widths for optimal MicroED data collection. Data from proteinase K lamellae were collected using 5, 10, and 20 eV energy filter slits. Our results show that the optimized energy filtering reduces background counts and improves the signal-to-noise ratio, enhancing the precision of intensity measurements and resulting in improved structural models. These findings provide insight into the optimization of energy filter slit settings that, when paired with direct electron detection, enhance data collection strategies by improving the signal-to-noise ratio, supporting higher quality data, and ultimately enabling more precise structure determination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.