ReviewBrain circulation
Cerebral microcirculation disorders after recanalization in acute ischemic stroke: A narrative review.
Review in Brain circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional microangiography of the mouse brain using super-resolution ultrasound and optoacoustic imaging with a spherical array transducer.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Risk score for futile recanalization: integrating cerebral circulation time and collateral cascade.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute ischemic stroke, a leading cause of global disability and mortality, faces a critical challenge of cerebral microcirculation disorders despite successful vascular recanalization. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the epidemiology, clinical significance, pathogenesis, assessment methods, and therapeutic strategies for post-recanalization microcirculatory dysfunction. Key findings from the literature reveal that microcirculation impairment, driven by hemodynamic instability, neutrophil-platelet interactions, fibrin deposition, endothelial/pericyte dysfunction, blood-brain barrier disruption, and oxidative stress, significantly contributes to futile recanalization and poor prognosis. Advanced imaging modalities, such as dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and two-photon microscopy, have emerged as pivotal tools for real-time evaluation of microvascular perfusion and permeability. Pharmacological interventions, including antiplatelet agents, neuroprotective drugs (e.g., butylphthalide), and traditional Chinese medicine (e.g., Danshen Chuanxiongqin), alongside non-pharmacological approaches such as normobaric hyperoxia and hypothermia therapy, demonstrate potential in mitigating microcirculatory injury. Recent clinical trials highlight promising strategies, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and targeted thromboinflammatory therapies, whereas preclinical studies underscore the role of pericytes in regulating capillary flow and neurovascular coupling. However, challenges persist in translating these findings into clinical practice, necessitating standardized assessment protocols and personalized treatment regimens. This review underscores the imperative for multidisciplinary collaboration and innovative research to optimize cerebral microcirculation recovery and help improve the treatment efficacy of acute ischemic stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.