ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Aortic valve stenosis and physical activity at high altitude in a female trekker: sex-specific considerations and the added value of a sports cardiology team-a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recommendations for high-altitude exposure in individuals with cardiovascular disease are largely based on expert opinion. This report details sport- and sex-specific recommendations for a patient with moderate aortic valve stenosis preparing for a high-altitude trek. Case summary: A 64-year-old woman with moderate, asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis and excellent functional capacity sought sports advice before a planned trek in the Himalayas. After a multidisciplinary sports cardiology team discussion and considering limited data on sex-specific cardiovascular responses to hypoxia, the trek was deemed safe with specific precautions. The patient was advised to limit activity to moderate intensity (74% of maximal heart rate), start at low altitude, and gradually ascend, not exceeding 2500 m and to descend immediately should symptoms occur. She was also counselled on the potential influence of sex hormones on exercise tolerance at high altitude. She successfully completed the trek without incident. Follow-up after 6 months showed progression to severe aortic stenosis, for which she underwent aortic valve and root replacement. Discussion: This case demonstrates that, following comprehensive evaluation, a high-altitude trek may be feasible in selected patients with moderate aortic stenosis. It highlights the need for individualized advice, taking into account physiological responses to high-altitude exposure, and emphasizes potential sex-specific considerations, despite limited data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.