Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42667015›Full record

ReviewBrain circulation

Immunomodulation of microglia/macrophages and neutrophils as immunotherapeutic targets in ischemic stroke: A narrative review.

Evren Ekingen, Rasit Dinc

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Evren EkingenDepartment of Accident and Emergency, Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Rasit DincDepartment of Research and Development, Invamed Medical Innovation Institute, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke (IS) remains a critical global issue characterized by high mortality and morbidity rates, primarily caused by neuronal death and brain dysfunction resulting from vascular occlusion. In secondary injuries following IS, inflammation plays a vital role, leading to increased neuronal damage and a poorer prognosis in the early stages. However, inflammation serves a dual purpose in stroke pathophysiology, promoting tissue repair and healing, especially in the later stages of stroke. Mechanical thrombectomy and intravenous thrombolysis are the primary therapeutic choices for IS. However, their narrow therapeutic windows and increased bleeding risks remain problematic. Recent research highlights the therapeutic potential of regulating immune cells, focusing on microglia, macrophages, and neutrophils, due to their dual roles in IS. Current preclinical and clinical studies have shown that this strategy holds promise in the prevention and management of IS. The aim of this review to assess the evolving landscape of immune modulation as therapeutic avenue in ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

Immune modulationischemic strokemacrophagesmicroglianeutrophils

Identifiers

PMID42667015
PMCPMC13524393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.