ArticleSexual medicine2026
Vaginal high-intensity focused ultrasound in women with genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a prospective exploratory study.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Energy-based therapies for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) remain controversial, and evidence for vaginal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and exploratory efficacy of vaginal HIFU in women with GSM. Methods: In this prospective, single-arm, exploratory study, women with GSM underwent vaginal HIFU and were followed for 24 weeks. Women with prior gynecologic surgery or treated malignancy were eligible if ≥6 months had elapsed and clinical stability was confirmed. Patient-reported outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) scores for GSM symptoms, the Vulvovaginal Symptoms Questionnaire (VSQ), the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). Objective measures included the Vaginal Health Index (VHI), vaginal pressure, pelvic organ prolapse quantification, vaginal pH, and vaginal microbiome profiling. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline to 12 weeks in the VAS score of the participant-identified most bothersome GSM symptom. Results: Eighteen women comprised the full analysis set. The primary endpoint showed a reduction in symptom severity (mean percent change -67.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -87.6% to -47.7%). Individual VAS scores decreased over time and were generally maintained throughout follow-up. The VSQ improved at 24 weeks (-40.4%; 95% CI, -64.6% to -16.2%), and the ICIQ-SF improved at 12 weeks (-29.0%; 95% CI, -54.6% to -3.4%), although this improvement was not sustained at 24 weeks. Total FSFI scores did not change. Improvements were observed in VHI and vaginal pressure, while vaginal pH and microbiome composition remained stable. No Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred. Discussion: In this exploratory study, vaginal HIFU was associated with improvements in the most bothersome GSM symptom and selected objective measures without serious adverse events. However, given its single-arm design and small sample size, no definitive conclusions regarding its efficacy or safety can be drawn, and further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms of action, optimize treatment parameters, characterize the safety profile, and determine the clinical utility of vaginal HIFU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.