ArticleCureus2026
Acute Bilateral Corneal Oedema Following Suspected Toxic Endothelial Insult: An Intriguing Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Visual recovery after a suspected toxic endothelial insult can be partial and uneven despite early improvement. We report a 40-year-old male who developed sudden bilateral blurring of vision with mild ocular discomfort after binge alcohol and marijuana intake, with an additional history of prolonged exposure to vehicle-emitted fumes. There was no history of trauma, contact lens use, ocular surgery, topical medication use, fever, discharge, or previous ocular disease. Examination showed severe bilateral visual reduction, epithelial oedema, diffuse stromal corneal oedema, central haze, and prominent Descemet's membrane folds. The intraocular pressure was normal, and there was no evidence of infective keratitis, uveitis, acute glaucoma, or overt chemical injury. Pachymetry confirmed marked corneal thickening, while specular microscopy showed endothelial compromise, especially in the left eye. After excluding common causes, acute bilateral toxic endothelial dysfunction was considered. The patient was managed with a topical steroid-antibiotic combination, 5% hypertonic saline, and lubricants. Corneal oedema reduced gradually, with vision improving to 6/36 in both eyes by three days and further improvement on follow-up; however, persistent endothelial dysfunction remained in the left eye, requiring planned keratoplasty. This case emphasises that toxic endothelial dysfunction should be considered in sudden bilateral corneal oedema when typical signs of infection, inflammation, raised intraocular pressure, trauma, or chemical burn are absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.