ReviewTherapeutics and clinical risk management2026
Risk Management in First-in-Human Trials of Intravenous Drugs: Current Practices and Future Perspectives.
Review in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the first-in-human (FIH) study, the intravenous (IV) administration represents a critical juncture where preclinical data meet human physiology, characterized by immediate systemic exposure and an extremely narrow margin for safety. The current management measures for these trials are fragmented and lack a systematic framework. This narrative review, informed by a structured synthesis of peer-reviewed literature, regulatory guidance documents, and systematic institutional experience from multiple IV FIH trials conducted between 2020 and 2025, summarizes the key risk factors for FIH-IV trials, including pharmacological uncertainties, formulation-related toxicity, infusion rate sensitivity, and participant heterogeneity. It further evaluates preventive strategies such as determination of starting dose, personnel management and ensuring operational readiness, standardization of medication preparation and administration, comprehensive safety monitoring, and emergency response coordination and infrastructure. The primary aim is to propose a conceptual, stratified risk management framework that categorizes trials into low-, moderate-, and high-risk levels based on drug-related, procedural, and participant-specific variables. Corresponding management strategies are then applied to each level: standardized for low risk, enhanced for moderate risk, and advanced for high risk. This structured approach optimizes safety assurance in high-risk trials while avoiding the overutilization of resources in low-risk settings. The proposed framework is intended as a conceptual supplement to existing regulatory guidelines (eg, ICH E6(R3), EMA FIH guideline) and requires prospective multicenter validation before broad implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.