Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42666959›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2026

Perceptual Contaminants to Assessments of Visuospatial Working Memory: The Influences of Path Clutterness and Endpoint Crowding.

Zechun Zhao, Freya Joessel, C Shawn Green, Susanne M Jaeggi, Aaron R Seitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zechun ZhaoDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3528-3150
Freya JoesselDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0088-0031
C Shawn GreenDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9290-0262
Susanne M JaeggiDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6165-2526
Aaron R SeitzDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4936-9303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying individual differences in various cognitive constructs has important implications for settings such as clinical and educational assessments. Yet, cognitive tasks themselves often do not measure a single construct. As such, there is value in understanding the mixture of constructs involved in cognitive task performance, as this would allow target constructs to be better isolated. For example, tasks assessing visuospatial working memory (VSWM), in addition to measuring the "of interest" processes of encoding and maintenance, also involve lower-level perceptual processes. Here, we examined perceptual contaminant effects on VSWM using a modified Corsi Block Tapping Task, in which participants observed and reproduced sequences of spatial locations. Two forms of perceptual interference were manipulated: path clutterness, in which distractors appeared near the virtual path connecting successive targets, and endpoint crowding, in which distractors appeared near the target locations themselves. Endpoint crowding produced clear decrements in task performance, whereas path clutterness produced no detectable changes in performance. These findings indicate that perceptual processes, specifically visual crowding, influence VSWM assessment. This underscores the importance of accounting for perceptual processes in the design and interpretation of working memory measures.

Indexed as

Corsi block tapping taskPerceptionVisuospatial working memory

Identifiers

PMID42666959
PMCPMC13523809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.