ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026
Teaching medical undergraduates Skills for Eye Examination: Is Flipped Classroom with Mental Rehearsal as Effective as Face-to-Face Teaching?
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The quality of face-to-face teaching (F2FT) of eye-examination is often suboptimal amidst busy clinics as it demands faculty time for teaching and feedback. Flipped Classroom (FC) and Mental Rehearsal (MR) are established methods to teach clinical skills. A learning module (Supplementary Clinical Ophthalmology Preparatory E-learning [SCOPE]) that combines FC and MR may address this practical problem. This quasi-experimental study compared the efficacy and Faculty Contact Time of SCOPE against F2FT in teaching fourth-year medical undergraduates eye-examination. Method: The SCOPE group (n = 95) received the same content as F2FT but delivered in deliberate sequence: e learning (instructional videos and Video Modelling Examples), followed by structured, audio guided MR, then face-to-face practice with feedback. The F2FT group (n = 51) learned in a single face-to-face session with live faculty demonstration and Video Modelling Examples, without instructional videos or MR. Results: Baseline pre-intervention mean Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) scores were comparable (22.31 versus 22.24, independent t-test, p = .94). Post-learning cognitive assessments found the SCOPE group to have greater gain in total MCQ scores with higher estimated marginal means (p < .001), and higher mean End-of-Rotation Test scores (43.37 versus 40.85, independent t-test, p = .048). On psychomotor assessments, the SCOPE group had superior Micro-CEX performances (three skills, all Discussion: SCOPE improved psychomotor and cognitive performances, and was more faculty time-efficient than F2FT in teaching eye examination skills. These positive results may be attributed to the synergistic effects of its multiple learning components. SCOPE, which combined FC and MR, may better facilitate clinical skill development through deliberate practice than F2FT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.