ArticleHeart rhythm O22026
Health care utilization for premature ventricular complexes in acute settings.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are common; however, their burden in acute health care settings is not well characterized. In parallel, therapies, particularly catheter ablation, have evolved, but contemporary trends in utilization remain unclear. Objective: To evaluate the trends in health care utilization for PVCs. Methods: We conducted an analysis of California statewide health care data from 2016 to 2022, including adults aged ≥18 years seen in an ambulatory surgery unit, emergency department, or inpatient hospital. PVCs and comorbidities were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes as primary or secondary diagnoses, and catheter ablation using ICD-10-Procedure Coding System and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Results: Among 87,819,413 health care encounters from 20,280,466 adults, 235,848 (0.27%) included a PVC diagnosis and 22,806 (0.03%) had PVCs as a primary diagnosis. Patients with PVCs were older, more often male, and white, and had more cardiovascular comorbidities. The proportion of encounters with PVCs increased from 0.19% in 2016 to 0.31% in 2022. Encounters with PVCs as the primary diagnosis rose from 0.023% to 0.029%. Between 2016 and 2022, 3394 catheter ablations for PVCs were performed, nearly doubling from 343 in 2016 to 619 in 2022. Of the 21,265 patients who had at least 1 principal diagnosis of PVCs, 3278 (15.4%) underwent catheter ablation for PVCs. Ablation recipients were older, predominantly male, and white, and had greater cardiovascular comorbidity. Conclusion: PVCs, though infrequently coded as a primary diagnosis, are increasingly recognized in acute health care settings. The doubling of ablation procedures underscores growing clinical attention and the expanding role of interventional management, particularly among high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.